|
Joined:
|
10-27-2008 12:48 PM
|
|
Last Login:
|
10-27-2008 12:48 PM
|
|
Website:
|
|
|
Location:
|
Unavailable to anonymous users.
|
|
Occupation:
|
Unavailable to anonymous users.
|
|
Interests:
|
Unavailable to anonymous users.
|
|
Signature:
|
|
|
|
Email:
|
Unavailable to anonymous users.
|
|
MSN IM:
|
Unavailable to anonymous users.
|
|
AIM:
|
Unavailable to anonymous users.
|
|
Yahoo IM:
|
Unavailable to anonymous users.
|
|
ICQ:
|
Unavailable to anonymous users.
|
|
|
AmyCarr has contributed to 3 out of 7,768 total posts (0.04% of total).
|
|
Most Recent Posts:
|
|
2nd Address Line Option
1/6/2009 11:54:22 AM
(Total replies: 1)
|
| We would like to be able to send letters to companies but still use the company title and the person in the address line. For example, my church is Spring Creek Baptist Church and the pastor is Brad Moore. I have one of two options for my mailing label:
Brad Moore
100 Spring Creek Road
Weatherford...
or-
Spring Creek Baptist Church
100 Spring Creek Road
Weatherford...
I would like to be able to address this as:
Brad Moore
c/o Spring Creek Baptist Church
100 Spring Creek ... |
|
|
|
Re: Please Help!
10/27/2008 12:58:00 PM
(Total replies: 1)
|
| shawnadunn-
We have a medical clinic that is separate completely from our pregnancy care center. We find consistently that women who would otherwise never go near a pregnancy care center will go to our clinic to find answers and receive hope in the process. I'd certainly be willing to discuss this possibility with you.
|
|
|
|
Letter feature
10/28/2008 3:48:39 PM
(Total replies: 0)
|
| I'd like to be able to use the follow up report to send a letter. I realize that this report is mainly for client side use, but I'd like to be able to mark my donors for follow up and use that report to print letters to that end.
Also, I'd like to have a no repeat option when sending correspondence to donors. If a particular donor has given more than once in a window of time, the report I'm having to use (the follow up report working with the letter feature would virtually solve this problem ... |
|
Search for more...
|
|
|